If you agree with this statement, post it in your blog/twitter/facebook/myspace/etc:
“I will not vote for any presidential or congressional candidate who votes in favor of the $700b bailout.” Pass it on.
blathering from some guy in taiwan
If you agree with this statement, post it in your blog/twitter/facebook/myspace/etc:
“I will not vote for any presidential or congressional candidate who votes in favor of the $700b bailout.” Pass it on.
In the first place, if Congress understood why the financial market was failing, it would have averted the problem.
SO, in due respect, IT IS OBVIOUS TO AMERICANS THAT YOU
CONGRESS does not understand the phenomena and, among those who say they do understand it, there is not enough agreement to proceed with a major fix.
Hence, only minor adjustments are in order.
The study of human and biological Systems tells us that the worst thing to do when a complex system drifts or changes is to implement a “knee-jerk” type of reaction because your instincts may be wrong and you may just make things worse.
The way to proceed to Socialism, if that is where we want to go, is in an orderly democratic fashion not with a jump off a cliff into water that we have not tested where we don’t know the depth.
Where is the forum for Americans to make their voices heard on this issue?
The pork-barell issue is just a distraction for people who do not have an idea of what really should be done. Why can’t the press uncover some of the real substantive issues involved like:
Why should the about 40 percent of the households in the US, who are renters, have to share in the costs of bailing out the mortgages of the 60 some percent who are homeowners and who already get substantial tax breaks to help them pay their mortgages. If anything, the “bailout bill†should have provisions for protecting those who were not involved in bringing on this problem from the devaluation of their income that will result from this bailout.
Its not funny, so why are your commenters laughing and making light of it and fixating on something stupid like the pork-barrel issue.
Why should the about 40 percent of the households in the US, who are renters, have to share in the costs of bailing out the mortgages of the 60 some percent who are homeowners and who already get substantial tax breaks to help them pay their mortgages.